The Liberal Lie, The Conservative Truth

Exposing the Liberal Lie through current events and history. “Republicans believe every day is the Fourth of July, but the democrats believe every day is April 15.” ****** "We will always remember. We will always be proud. We will always be prepared, so we may always be free." RONALD REAGAN

My Photo
Name:
Location: Myrtle Beach, South Carolina, United States

Two Reagan conservatives who believe that the left has it wrong and just doesn't get it!

Photobucket
Google
HISTORICAL QUOTE OF THE WEEK - "Always bear in mind that your own resolution to succeed is more important than any other." ABRAHAM LINCOLN

Tuesday, January 10, 2006

ALITO HEARINGS CONTINUE WITH ANSWERS TO TOUGH QUESTIONS

Judge Samuel Alito continued the process of answering questions today as the Senate Judiciary Committee Hearings went into their second day. Judge Alito made some strong statements concerning several subjects including abortion which he stated he would view with an open mind which is exactly how a Supreme Court Justice should view ANY case before the court and not pre-judge as the left suggests any conservative Judge will do when considering Roe vs Wade. Although I am a pro-life proponent and believe that abortion is not a Constitutional right, (the decision was based on the right to privacy clause which I believe was an inaccurate interpretation of the Constitution), it is the law of the land because of decisions made by the high court years ago and unless it is over turned any Judge should view it on a case by case basis. Another issue that Alito was questioned about was the practice by several current Associate Judges of reviewing decisions made in high courts in other countries and applying those decisions to United States law. Alito stated without hesitation that United States Constitutional law was the ONLY basis for making any decision on the court and while other country decisions were interesting reading they had no business being applied in our courts. Bravo Judge Alito. One important aspect that the left continually forgets when a Republican President nominates a judge for the court is that Constitutionally a sitting President has the right and authority to nominate who he wishes. That comes with winning an election and regardless which party the President represents he is the Constitutional authority for appointing judges with the, "advise and consent, "of the Senate. When Ruth Ginsberg was appointed by Clinton for example the Republican minority though disagreeing with her judicial philosophy did not stand in the way of her confirmation as the left is threatening with Alito. The Democrats have an illusion that they are the protectors of the court and it is their responsibility to filibuster and disrupt any conservative nomination. Appointing judges is an Executive privilege and not a Congressional responsibility. This does not mean that a judge should not be questioned but it does mean that political games should be put aside in order to advance a civil and quick confirmation process. As long as the nominee is qualified and Alito IS HIGHLY qualified with endorsements from both the left and the right as well as prominent legal organizations then his confirmation should be allowed to pass without filibuster or disruption as the left is threatening. Remember the up or down vote is a Senate rule and not a Constitutional mandate. The Senate's responsibility is advise and consent only. Tomorrow will be interesting as the left has already indicated more tough questioning of Alito. Today the Judge was on the mark and tomorrow should be similar.

Ken Taylor

3 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

I have never argued against Alito. I just think his judicial philosophy and temperament should be considered before he is appointed for life. You seem to argue that whomsoever the President wants should basically be accepted no matter what. If that were the case, we would have ended up with a horribly unqualified Justice Harriet Miers.

Unlike you, I think it is perfectly appropriate for members of both parties to ask questions of the president's judicial nominees. You ridicule duly elected (Democratic) Senators who won statewide elections and who represent large numbers of people because you are of a different political party. I may be wrong, but I don't believe that is the heart of American democracy.

9:08 PM, January 10, 2006  
Blogger Mike's America said...

Oi Rob! We're not still on the Harriet Miers thing are we?

And you couldn't get any more qualified than Alito.

Nothing wrong with exploring judicial philosophy and temperament, but unfortunately, that's gotten twisted by the Democrats into an unholy Constitutional litmus test on abortion.

Frankly, I would have been happy with Miers but am even more so with Alito.

7:51 PM, January 11, 2006  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Please, the Republicans have a "holy" Constitutional litmus test on abortion. That is what doomed Miers. The Religious Right was not convinced. It certainly was not the Democrats.

My personal concern with Alito is that he appears to fall on the side of big business and big government over individual rights. Alito appears to be a believer in more expansive rights for the Executive Branch. I just philosophically do not agree and do not believe that is the intent of the framers of the Constitution.

11:13 PM, January 11, 2006  

Post a Comment

<< Home

website hit counters
Provided by website hit counters website.